[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090723144520.ced5f8f1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:45:20 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CGroup: Support for named and empty hierarchies
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:37:53 -0700
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:13 PM, KAMEZAWA
> Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you. I'd like to look into procps package to allow
> >
> > #ps -lf -cgroup=/xxxx/yyy
> > or
> > #top -cgroup=/xxx/yyy
> >
>
> Wouldn't it be less invasive to change procps so that doing
>
> ps <pid1> <pid2> ...
>
> only actually looks at /proc/<pid1>, /proc/<pid2>, etc, rather than
> looking at all of them and then throwing away any that aren't in the
> supplied list?
>
> Then you could do what you want with ps $(cat /dev/cgroup/xxxx/yyy/tasks)
>
Good point. When you try strace
#strace ps -ef --pid XXXX
you'll see ps scan all pids. The same behavior for pkill, pgrep etc...
AFAIK, this is a behavior from Linux 2.4 ages.
By this, ps -ef --pid=XXX can take 1ms if 2000 procs are on system.
# I think this is because ps uses an unified filter routine.
So, I have to rewrite filter routine or add cgroup support.
Abyway, adding a new toggle switch to "top", "pgrep" is worth to do, I think.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists