linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/2] move binfmt filed to signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A68FD3B.7040606@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:15:55 +0900
From:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] move binfmt filed to signal_struct

Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/22, Roland McGrath wrote:
>>>> Because the binfmt is not different between threads in the same process,
>>>> it can be moved from task_struct to signal_struct.
>>> Seems like a logical cleanup to me.
>> IMHO binfmt belongs in mm_struct.
> 
> Ah, agreed.
> 
> Hiroshi, what do you think?

yeah, it sounds better. I'll try to update.

Thanks,
Hiroshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/