[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248441290.6987.52.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:14:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: sen wang <wangsen.linux@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernel@...ivas.org,
npiggin@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: report a bug about sched_rt
Don't top post -- again!
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 21:04 +0800, sen wang wrote:
> Linux is used in many fieldes. SCHED_OTHER tasks is important to
> embedded system.
Irrelevant.
> if there is a running state task(a realtime task), how can we
> shcedule the idle task up?
Because it ran out of bandwidth.
> It is ridiculous!
>
> since the throttle has a bug, why not fix it?
It doesn't have a bug, therefore I won't fix it.
The throttle limits the RT tasks to a bandwidth w of u/p.
Since real-time scheduling is about determinism a maximum bandwidth
larger than the minimum bandwidth specified by w is useless since it
cannot be relied upon.
Therefore we don't run RT tasks beyond their bandwidth limit.
Go read up on scheduling theory.
Now you might want a bandwidth of 100% for your RT application (not
something I can recommend for the overall health of your machine) in
which case you're free to change this setting:
echo -1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
Should do that for you. Also read:
Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists