[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248458723-12146-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:05:23 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fix cond_resched_lock() in !CONFIG_PREEMPT
The might_sleep() test inside cond_resched_lock() assumes the spinlock
is held and then preemption is disabled. This is true with CONFIG_PREEMPT
but the preempt_count() doesn't change otherwise.
Check by starting from the appropriate preempt offset depending on the
config.
Reported-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index cb070dc..2c35bc2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2294,8 +2294,14 @@ extern int _cond_resched(void);
extern int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET PREEMPT_OFFSET
+#else
+#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET 0
+#endif
+
#define cond_resched_lock(lock) ({ \
- __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_OFFSET); \
+ __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET); \
__cond_resched_lock(lock); \
})
--
1.6.2.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists