[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ws5yoo44.wl%peterc@nicta.com.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:39:55 +1000
From: Peter Chubb <peterc@...ato.unsw.edu.au>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: minor Makefile simplification through use of cc-ifversion
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> writes:
Sam> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Sam> The above change is correct. But I really wonder if the original
Sam> code was correct? Do we really only want to use the -mtune
Sam> options for this specific gcc version? If this is indeed the
Sam> case this deserves a comment explaning this.
I suspect it should be all compilers after this one. -mtune=mckinley didn't
work very well in the early gcc 3 compilers and didn't exist in
version 2.
--
Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc@...ato.unsw.edu.au
http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists