linux-kernel - 2.6.30 BUG? Full load, but nice levels cause CPU idle time?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9871ee5f0907241214n3667740ekcee82c98063c8283@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:14:00 -0400
From:	Timothy Normand Miller <theosib@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.30 BUG? Full load, but nice levels cause CPU idle time?

I'm not subscribed, so please include me in the CC on this.

I'm running 2.6.30 (gentoo).  I have a quad core (Intel Q9450), and I
have four CPU intensive processes running.  Three of them are set to
nice +5, while one is at +0.  When I look at the CPU load in top, I
find that the +0 gets 100% of a CPU to itself.  The three +5's are
sharing two CPUs, leaving the fourth CPU completely idle.

Is this supposed to happen?  It seems to me that if there's work to
do, no CPU should be left idle, right?

Thanks.

-- 
Timothy Normand Miller
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
Open Graphics Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/