[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090724213218.GA13702@logfs.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:32:19 +0200
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, Sam Ramji <sramji@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 34/54] Staging: hv: remove STRUCT_PACKED and STRUCT_ALIGNED defines
On Tue, 21 July 2009 01:46:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 17 July 2009, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ typedef struct _RING_BUFFER {
> > // volatile u32 InterruptMask;
> > // Ring data starts here + RingDataStartOffset !!! DO NOT place any fields below this !!!
> > u8 Buffer[0];
> > -} STRUCT_PACKED RING_BUFFER;
> > +} __attribute__((packed)) RING_BUFFER;
> >
>
> The data structure is actually packed already, the attribute does not make it better
> and could be removed. We also have __packed as a shortcut for __attribute__((packed)).
Honestly, I don't know how useful __packed really is. In a shared
kernel/userspace header, it is only defined for the kernel.
Jörn
--
Do not stop an army on its way home.
-- Sun Tzu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists