linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] flexible array implementation v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f86c2480907232026v143aef06t652796b489b7ad2c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:26:47 -0700
From:	Benjamin Blum <bblum@...gle.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com,
	vda.linux@...glemail.com, mikew@...gle.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] flexible array implementation v4

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:08 PM, KAMEZAWA
Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:02:28 +0800
> Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> Dave Hansen wrote:
>> > Remaining issues:
>> > - How should we deal with out-of-range indexes, especially
>> >   in flex_array_get() which returns void*?  ERR_PTR()?
>> >   BUG_ON()?  return NULL (current behavior)?
>> > - Should care be taken not to allow a flex_array_get() to
>> >   an index where no flex_array_put() was done?
>> > - Should we decay further than just packing things into the
>> >   'base' page?  Should we actually kmalloc() less than a
>> >   page at times when it will fit?
>> >
>>
>> I sugguest find some candidate users and see how this flex_array
>> fits them.
>>
> Hmm, can't we rewrite cgroup->tasks file using this ?
> I'll try some if I have time.
>
> -Kame
>
>
>

I can do that; it would go nicely on top of my procs file patch
series, but probably wants to wait until after both patch series have
been accepted (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/23/330 )
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/