[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907252019.01266.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:18:58 +0200
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
> > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>
> >
> > +
> > +static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> > + .resume = au1xmmc_resume,
> > + .suspend = au1xmmc_suspend,
> > +};
> > +
>
> Was suspend to disk tested? It requires freeze()/thaw().
Is that a regression introduced by this patch then? If so, many more of
the recent dev_pm_ops conversion patches would need to be revisited.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists