linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.27.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090725033030.GA481@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:30:30 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
Cc:	webmaster@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27.28

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:49:53AM +0200, Éric Piel wrote:
> Currently, there is no clue on www.kernel.org that 2.6.27 is a "long
> term stable" kernel tree. Would it be possible to add a line to the page
> pointing to the latest version of this type of tree? I'm sure some
> people would love discovering that such thing exists :-)

I'm curious as to why someone, if they were inclined to be using such a
thing, wouldn't already know about this?

How many people really are relying on this .27 branch, becides the
distros, these days?  And if you are, why?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/