linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH take 2][RFC] fat: Save FAT root directory timestamps to volume label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fxclmhxy.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date:	Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:48:25 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	Jorg Schummer <ext-jorg.2.schummer@...ia.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH take 2][RFC] fat: Save FAT root directory timestamps to volume label

Jorg Schummer <ext-jorg.2.schummer@...ia.com> writes:

> Standard FAT implementations cannot store any of the FAT root directory's
> timestamps. This commit adds the mount option 'rootts', which allows saving
> the FAT root directory timestamps as the timestamps of the FAT volume label
> directory entry. At least Mac OS X is known to support the same mechanism
> and interoperate with this commit.
>
> When mounting, the following values can be specified for the 'rootts' mount
> option:
>
>   "rootts=ignore"   ignores root directory timestamps. All timestamps are
>                     reset to 0 (1/1/1970). This is the default.
>
>   "rootts=load"     only tries to load the root directory's timestamps from
>                     a volume label entry when mounting.
>
>   "rootts=preserve" tries to load and save the root directory's timestamps
>                     if a volume label entry exists.
>
>   "rootts=save"     tries to load and save the root directory's timestamps.
>                     If the root directory was accessed but no volume label
>                     entry exists, the label "NO NAME" is created.

Looks like interesting hack. However, personally, I don't think I want
this, but I guess it can be only me.

Well, so, what is this for? If rootdir doesn't have timestamp, some app
is not working, or something?

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/