linux-kernel - Re: [FIX REQUEST] Need better management for include/linux/*.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090727135451.0754ba6e@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:54:51 +0200
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, hskinnemoen@...el.com,
	kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [FIX REQUEST] Need better management for include/linux/*.h

Avi Kivity wrote:
> IMO a much better move is to place non-ABI files (and the #ifdef KERNEL 
> parts of ABI files) outside include/linux.

How about adding a new include/soc directory and move them all there
(along with similar header files from other SoC vendors)?

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/