linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/perf_counter: Add alignment-faults and emulation-faults sw events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090727015134.GA18301@kryten>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:51:34 +1000
From:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/perf_counter: Add alignment-faults and
	emulation-faults sw events


Hi Ben,

> BTW. The patch relies on some perctr changes I don't have in my tree
> (PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS isn't defined for me)
> 
> Ingo, how do you want to handle that ? Should I wait til round 2 of the
> merge window before putting Anton's patch in or can I merge some of your
> stuff in powerpc-next as pre-reqs ? Or you can just take Anton's patch
> with my:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> 
> And stick it in your own queue (though pls, give me a pointer to the git
> tree in question so I can verify that I don't get new stuff that
> conflicts before we get to the merge window).

I've got another round of this series that I'll send out today.

Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/