[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A6DBD51.6040103@phuk.ath.cx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:44:33 +0200
From: list@...k.ath.cx
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624
>> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
>> Submitter : <list@...k.ath.cx>
>> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old)
>
> There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel
> bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that
> various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't
> support it properly.
>
> Alan Stern
>
I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells
me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that
don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light
off, etc...). Is that true?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists