[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248712948.28841.56.camel@desktop>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:42:28 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, matthias@...hlcke.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Patch RFC 36/37] fs: Convert bd_mount_sem to mutex
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 17:30 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:20:38AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > bd_mount_sem is used as mutex so make it a mutex.
> >
> > Actually we may return to userspace with it held, so the conversion
> > is a bad idea. But I have a patch I need to post to completely get
> > rid of it.
>
> That's why it's RFC :)
You better inspect these at much greater detail.. Matthias (added to the
CC) , and I did a great number of semaphore to mutex changes and I don't
recall there being too many clear easy ones remaining .. So unless the
semaphore was added in the past 12 months or so , I'd treat it as likely
unsafe for converting to a mutex..
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists