[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090727165901.GA8854@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:59:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] task_struct cleanup: move binfmt field to mm_struct
(add Rusty)
On 07/27, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>
> void set_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *new)
> {
> - if (current->binfmt)
> - module_put(current->binfmt->module);
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!mm);
> + if (mm->binfmt)
I am not sure we need this BUG_ON() above. If mm == NULL we will
have the same debug info after the crash.
> @@ -619,6 +621,9 @@ struct mm_struct *dup_mm(struct task_struct *tsk)
> mm->hiwater_rss = get_mm_rss(mm);
> mm->hiwater_vm = mm->total_vm;
>
> + if (mm->binfmt && !try_module_get(mm->binfmt->module))
> + goto free_pt;
free_pt does mmput() which calls module_put(mm->binfmt->module). This
is not right when try_module_get() fails. Hmm, the same if dup_mmap()
fails, we are doing an extra module_put().
Perhaps we can use __module_get() again, current->mm->binfmt holds a
reference. But this is a user-visible change, currently fork() can't
succeed if ->module->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING.
So I think we need another small change:
free_pt:
+ mm->binfmt = NULL;
mmput(mm);
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists