[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907271917.56148.philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:17:55 +0200
From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
To: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: drbd tree build failure
On Monday 27 July 2009 10:09:57 Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:48:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Philipp,
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c: In function
> > 'drbd_thread_current_set_cpu': drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c:1592:
> > error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed'
> >
> > Introduced by commit 8a4ebc3fbd90072ac870064a930fe612eea6d9a1 ("DRBD:
> > main") from the drbd interacting with commit
> > 84cf7f02712e3491fb9776f950a8c4f413204c8b
> > ("cpumask:remove-set_cpus_allowed") from the rr tree.
> >
> > I am not sure what the transformation to the new infrastructure is here -
> > maybe Rusty can help?
> >
> > For today, I have reverted the rr tree commit above but we need a better
> > solution.
>
> I think we can easily use set_cpus_allowed_ptr() instead,
> as in fact, we do not have the cpu mask on the stack.
> But embeded in struct drbd_conf.
Ok. Lars' patch is now complete and arrived in the git tree...
It should build now with Rusty's paches.
-phil
--
: Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: Tel: +43-1-8178292-50, Fax: +43-1-8178292-82
: http://www.linbit.com
DRBD(R) and LINBIT(R) are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists