[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248725893.6987.2055.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:18:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Deng, Dongdong" <Dongdong.Deng@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softlockup: fix problem with long kernel pauses from
kgdb
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 15:03 -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
> The fix is to simply invoke sched_clock_tick() to update "cpu sched
> clock" on exit from kgdb_handle_exception.
Is that a regular IRQ context, or is that NMI context?
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <Dongdong.Deng@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: peterz@...radead.org
> ---
> kernel/softlockup.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/softlockup.c
> +++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
> }
>
> if (touch_timestamp == 0) {
> + /* If the time stamp was touched externally make sure the
> + * scheduler tick is up to date as well */
> + sched_clock_tick();
> __touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> return;
> }
>
Aside from the funny comment style (please fix) the fix does look
sensible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists