| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:24:44 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Paul.Clements@...eleye.com, tytso@....edu, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, miklos <miklos@...redi.hu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow userspace block device implementation On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 09:46 -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote: > Can you swap over NBD? Assuming one had pinned the userspace program > and it pre-allocated all memory so no pagein / alloc was required, would > it be deadlock proof? I believe there are structure allocations > required for the socket implementation that go beyond the basic BIO > allocations, therefore making it impossible. In /theory/, one should be > able to swap over this device. In practice, it's probably a really bad > idea. I've got patches to make swap over network work, with those swap over NBD works until you loose connection. NBDs great weakness (aside from funny code) is that it does the connection management in userspace, which makes recovering from connection loss when swapping over it utterly impossible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists