lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	"Moussa A. Ba" <moussa.a.ba@...il.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	jaredeh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pagemap clear_refs: modify to specify anon or mapped
 vma clearing

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Moussa A. Ba wrote:

> This patch makes the clear_refs proc interface a bit more versatile.
> It adds support  for clearing anonymous pages, file mapped pages or both.
> 

It already has support for clearing both, so you're only adding anonymous 
and file-backed filters.

> The clear_refs entry is used to reset the Referenced bits on virtual and
> physical pages associated with a process.
> echo 1 > /proc/PID/clear_refs clears all pages associated with the process
> echo 2 > /proc/PID/clear_refs clears anonymous pages only
> echo 3 > /proc/PID/clear_refs clears file mapped pages only
> Any other value written to the proc entry will clear all pages.
> 

clear_refs currently accepts any non-zero value, so it's possible that 
this will break user scripts that, for whatever reason, write '2' or '3'.  
I think that's acceptable, but it would be helpful to make all other 
values a no-op similar to drop_caches at this point to avoid the potential 
for breakage if this is ever extended any further.

> Selective clearing the pages has a measurable impact on performance as it
> limits the number of page walks.  We have been using this interface and  this
> adds flexibility to the user user space application implementing the reference
> clearing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jared Hulbert (jaredeh@...il.com)
> Signed-off-by: Moussa A. Ba (moussa.a.ba@...il.com)

Email addresses in < > braces, please.

The first sign-off line normally indicates who wrote the patch, but your 
submission lacks a From: line, so git would indicate you wrote it.  If 
that's incorrect, please add a From: line as described in 
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.  If it's correct, please reorder your 
sign-off lines.

> -------
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt |    7 +++++++
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c                 |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c	2009-07-21 14:30:01.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c	2009-07-27 11:46:05.000000000 -0700
> @@ -462,6 +462,27 @@
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static void walk_vma_area(struct mm_walk *this_walk,
> +			  struct vm_area_struct *vma, int type)
> +{

This is a very generic name for something that is only applicable to 
clear_refs, so please name it accordingly.  This will also avoid having to 
pass the struct mm_walk * in since its only user is clear_refs_walk.

> +
> +	/* Writing 2 to /proc/pid/clear_refs will clear all Anonymous
> +	 * pages.
> +	 *
> +	 * Writing 3 to /proc/pid/clear_refs will clear all file mapped
> +	 * pages.
> +	 *
> +	 * Writing any other value including 1 will clear all pages
> +	 */

Documentation/CodingStyle would suggest this format:

	/*
	 * Multi-line kernel comments always start ..
	 * with an empty first line.
	 */

> +	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
> +		return;
> +	if (type == 2 && vma->vm_file)
> +		return;
> +	if (type == 3 && !vma->vm_file)
> +		return;
> +	walk_page_range(vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, this_walk);
> +}

K&R would suggest #define's (or enums) for those hard-coded values.  I 
think that's already been suggested for this patch, actually.

> +
>  static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user * buf,
>  				size_t count, loff_t * ppos)
>  {
> @@ -469,13 +490,15 @@
>  	char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF], *end;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm;
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	int type;
> 
>  	memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
>  	if (count > sizeof(buffer) - 1)
>  		count = sizeof(buffer) - 1;
>  	if (copy_from_user(buffer, buf, count))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> -	if (!simple_strtol(buffer, &end, 0))
> +	type = strict_strtol(buffer, &end, 0);
> +	if (!type)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	if (*end == '\n')
>  		end++;
> @@ -491,9 +514,7 @@
>  		down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  		for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
>  			clear_refs_walk.private = vma;
> -			if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
> -				walk_page_range(vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
> -						&clear_refs_walk);
> +			walk_vma_area(&clear_refs_walk, vma, type);
>  		}
>  		flush_tlb_mm(mm);
>  		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt	2009-07-20 17:29:11.000000000
> -0700
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt	2009-07-27 12:08:34.000000000
> -0700
> @@ -375,6 +375,13 @@
>  This file is only present if the CONFIG_MMU kernel configuration option is
>  enabled.
> 
> +The clear_refs entry is used to reset the Referenced bits on virtual and physical
> +pages associated with a process.
> +echo 1 > /proc/PID/clear_refs clears all pages associated with the process
> +echo 2 > /proc/PID/clear_refs clears anonymous pages only
> +echo 3 > /proc/PID/clear_refs clears file mapped pages only
> +Any other value written to the proc entry will clear all pages.
> +

Please follow the format in this document for how other /proc/PID/* 
entries are described.

That format could really be improved here, perhaps you could clean 
proc.txt up a little bit while you're here?


Also, as the author of clear_refs, please cc me on future revisions of 
this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ