[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090727144402.513369f1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:44:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Chia-chi Yeh (_________)
<chiachi@...roid.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Keep interface binding when sending packets with
ipi_ifindex = 0
(cc netdev)
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:39:28 -0700
Chia-chi Yeh (_________) <chiachi@...roid.com> wrote:
> In IPv4, sending a packet with ipi_ifindex = 0 via an interface-bound
> socket will unbind the packet to that interface. This behavior is
> different from IPv6 which treats ipi6_ifindex = 0 as unspecified.
> Furthermore, IPv6 does not allow sending packets to other interface
> than the bound one, but I am not sure if it is necessary in IPv4. The
> following patch keeps the interface binding when ipi_ifindex = 0.
>
> Thanks,
> Chia-chi
>
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c 2009-07-24 04:50:45.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c 2009-07-24 04:51:09.000000000 +0800
> @@ -213,7 +213,8 @@
> if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(struct in_pktinfo)))
> return -EINVAL;
> info = (struct in_pktinfo *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg);
> - ipc->oif = info->ipi_ifindex;
> + if (info->ipi_ifindex)
> + ipc->oif = info->ipi_ifindex;
> ipc->addr = info->ipi_spec_dst.s_addr;
> break;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists