lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:00:27 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, jens.axboe@...cle.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic-ipi: make struct call_function_data lockless

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:50:16 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> This patch can remove spinlock from struct call_function_data, the 
> reasons are below:
> 
> 1: add a new interface for cpumask named cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(),
>    it can atomically test and clear specific cpu, we can use it instead
>    of cpumask_test_cpu() and cpumask_clear_cpu() and no need data->lock
>    to protect those in generic_smp_call_function_interrupt().
> 
> 2: in smp_call_function_many(), after csd_lock() return, the current's
>    cfd_data is deleted from call_function list, so it not have race
>    between other cpus, then cfs_data is only used in
>    smp_call_function_many() that must disable preemption and not from
>    a hardware interrupthandler or from a bottom half handler to call,
>    only the correspond cpu can use it, so it not have race in current
>    cpu, no need cfs_data->lock to protect it.
> 
> 3: after 1 and 2, cfs_data->lock is only use to protect cfs_data->refs in
>    generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(), so we can define cfs_data->refs
>    to atomic_t, and no need cfs_data->lock any more.

Looks good to me.  One tiny cleanup:

--- a/kernel/smp.c~generic-ipi-make-struct-call_function_data-lockless-cleanup
+++ a/kernel/smp.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
 
 		data->csd.func(data->csd.info);
 
-		refs = atomic_sub_return(1, &data->refs);
+		refs = atomic_dec_return(&data->refs);
 		WARN_ON(refs < 0);
 		if (!refs) {
 			spin_lock(&call_function.lock);
_


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ