lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:34:51 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@....net>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13750] Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate

On Monday 27 July 2009, Duncan wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 23:21:06 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13750
> > > Subject		: Load average flatlines after returning from hibernate
> > > Submitter	: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@....net>
> > > Date		: 2009-07-09 15:14 (18 days old)
> >
> > commit 6301cb95c119ebf324bb96ee226fa9ddffad80a7
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Date:   Fri Jul 17 14:15:47 2009 +0200
> >
> >     sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
> >
> >
> > commit a468d389349a7560249b355cdb6d2097ea1616c9
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Date:   Fri Jul 17 14:15:46 2009 +0200
> >
> >     sched: fix load average accounting vs. cpu hotplug
> 
> [replied to all]
> 
> That's presumably correct, as rc4 (on-tag at last git pull) resolved it.
> 
> Just updated the bug.

Thanks.
 
> (I didn't know whether CODE_FIX or PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE was correct, and 
> the status link is to the generic bugzilla resolutions, so not much help.  I 
> picked CODE_FIX.  I guess that's the next bug I file, on bugzilla.kernel.org 
> itself.)

For the bugs on the regression lists CODE_FIX is correct if the fix has been
merged by Linus or the problem has been confirmed not to be present in the
Linus' tree any more.  In wich case the bug should be marked as CLOSED.

Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ