[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907271533070.23587@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> My prosal was to use the size and objsize parameters. You would only have
> to call calculate_sizes() twice when the comparison of the order of size
> and objsize would be different.
>
> Doing so would simplify additing future flags. If you do your own
> calculations (like in the patch) then you have to replicate the size
> calculation from calculate_sizes() somehow. Is the duplicate calculation
> really accurate regarding alignment and other special casing?
>
Ok, fair enough. It seems like a matter of taste in implementation but
your proposal is also more extendable than mine, and I'm definitely not
going to argue your taste vs. mine when it comes to slub :)
I'll write an incremental patch on top of Pekka's for-next branch to
implement your idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists