linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:49:26 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...izon.net>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13841] 2.6.31-rc4 boot failure

On Monday 27 July 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >of recent regressions.
> >
> >The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >from 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >(either way).
> >
> Yes.  I have nuked the odd stuff in my rc.local file, and rebuilt this kernel 
> with several mods that I thought might be related, but it is still failing in 
> the same manner.  The error messages (apparently from lp:, but long after cups 
> has been started) do NOT make it to the messages log file either, so its 
> totally blown up at that point.
> 
> Note, that this is a regression from 2.6 31-rc3, which works fine.  So the 
> thing shouldn't be that hard to find.  But in looking over the changelog, 
> nothing obviously reaches out and grabs me.
> 
> I'm not really equipt to do a bisect here either, my git from F10 is at least 
> 2 versions old now.  And I'm crippled by a way too small /boot partition which 
> can't hold more than 12-14 kernels.  The disk partitioning tool in F10 is 
> nothing short of fscking broken IMO. But fedora isn't interested in that 
> either, cuz its existed since at least Fedora 2.  Here, fedora is on its way 
> out, 64 bit mandriva sure looks nice.  And DiskDrake Just Works(TM).
> 
> Thanks Rafael, I thought it was being ignored.

You're welcome, thanks for the update.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/