[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c86c4470907280213o66cbd069l1cc16089f9f07bf7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:13:16 +0200
From: stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: perfmon2-devel <perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>,
Corey J Ashford <cjashfor@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Philip Mucci <mucci@...s.utk.edu>,
Dan Terpstra <terpstra@...s.utk.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: perf_counters issue with self-sampling threads
Andi,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Andi Kleen<andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:51:04AM +0200, stephane eranian wrote:
>> [Reposting the message because of stupid MIME-encoding error on my part]
>> Andi,
>>
>> Looks like SIGPROF is calling _group_send_sig_info(), so I
>> think it is subject to the same problem.
>
> So sounds like a whole class of signals can't be POSIX compliant.
>
Well, the problem is that I don't where to find the POSIX spec that defines
signal types and how they should be handled in multi-threaded programs.
That would be a good starting point.
> Likely others will run into the same problem.
>
> Perhaps should define a new sigaction flag for this to make
> it all explicit.
>
That's probably a clean way of doing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists