[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090728141740.44d53b68@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:17:40 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the
usb.current tree
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:35:04 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:29:11 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > I need to look at the actual diff, but the combination looks completely
> > bogus unless I'm misreading the fixup which is possible.
>
> Below is the actual patch from the usb.current tree.
Thanks - ok that is probably safe. The change I was worried about (the
error paths not adjusting port->count are ok as it gets zeroed within the
mutex)
Not sure its safe versus hangup but neither was the old code 8)
Oliver: I'll send you an alternative patch later today/tomorrow that uses
the ASYNC flags.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists