[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090728161131.GA22349@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:11:32 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
e3-hacking@...th.li, Arun KS <arunks@...tralsolutions.com>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: Add support for Conexant
CX20442-11 voice modem codec
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:07:29PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> What I would like to retain from the current codec driver are those two modes
> of operation: without and with the line discipline activated. Initially, the
> codec would be registered as a platform device, as it is now. Activation of
> the line discipline would deregister the codec device from the platform bus
> and reregister it again, now as the line discipline provided device. Is this
> possible with current ASoC framework?
No, not currently. But why would you do that, anyway?
Like I say, I'd suggest always keeping the controls registered and just
masking and unmasking from user space - the control indexes get used so
removing them will just confuse things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists