[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0907281548150.16740@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:52:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, sfi-devel@...plefirmware.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] SFI: document boot param "sfi=off"
> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 10:13:49 pm Len Brown wrote:
> > From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> >
> > "sfi=off" is analogous to "acpi=off"
> >
> > In practice, "sfi=off" isn't likely to be very useful, for
> > 1. SFI is used only when ACPI is not available
> > 2. Today's SFI systems are not legacy PC-compatible
> >
> > ie. "sfi=off" on an ACPI-platform is a NO-OP,
> > and "sfi=off" on an SFI-platform will likely result in boot failure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++++
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> I think the documentation update should be part of the patch
> that changes the functionality, so the doc always matches the
> code.
True.
I was somewhat lazy when i generated this patch series
from as single patch, and split mainly in groups of files.
Re: sfi=off
I'm actually going to delete this one --
perhaps adding it later when/if it does something useful.
thanks,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists