[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cone.1248852351.306728.15136.1000@arca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:25:51 +0200
From: Peter Feuerer <peter@...e.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acerhdf: convert to dev_pm_ops
Hi Boris,
Borislav Petkov writes:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Peter Feuerer<peter@...e.net> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>>> That's not a reason for keeping code in the kernel and raising bloat
>>> levels unnecessarily. If the driver doesn't need to do anything on
>>> resume, then no function is needed.
>>
>> I don't think the verbose message is useless. If an user has a problem
>> with suspend / hibernate I can just ask him to load the module with
>> verbose=1 and dmesg tells whether the module is waking up or not.
>
> Since the driver doesn't do anything upon resume, it _is_ _going_ to
> resume just fine. If not, then the problem is located somewhere else,
> i.e. you can safely assume that you are resuming ok. Also, it's not like
> this is the only verbose printk you have in the driver to not be able to
> follow what's going on...
Ok, I think you are right. So we will remove the resume functionality and
keep just the suspend + freeze calls?
Btw, should I resend the 0.5.13 → 0.5.16 patch splitted up, so that Len can
apply them?
kind regards,
--peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists