[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A70006D.8020401@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:55:25 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3 -mm] generic-ipi: cleanup for generic_smp_call_function_interrupt()
Use smp_processor_id() instead of get_cpu() and put_cpu() in
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(), It's no need to disable preempt,
beacuse we must call generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() with interrupts
disabled
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/smp.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 1b5fd2e..3035ab8 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data, int wait)
void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void)
{
struct call_function_data *data;
- int cpu = get_cpu();
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
/*
* Ensure entry is visible on call_function_queue after we have
@@ -207,7 +207,6 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void)
csd_unlock(&data->csd);
}
- put_cpu();
}
/*
--
1.6.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists