[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A704288.5080406@mnementh.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:37:28 +0100
From: Ian Molton <ian@...menth.co.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>
Subject: Re: MMC: Make the configuration memory resource optional
Mark Brown wrote:
Hi Mark,
> Looking at the original patch I'm not sure exactly why it runs into
> clock API issues so I'm not sure if this is a relevant concern or not
> here
The problem for tmio-mmc is that its an MFD driver. The idea behind the
MFD framework was to allow drivers that work on similar hardware to work
both independantly and as part of a MFD, which often have extra core logic.
Using the clock API is problematic, then, because for MFD based users of
tmio-mmc, the clock API isnt useable, but for non-MFD users, it is.
tmio-mmc has (currently) some code in it that uses a second IO range to
control both clocks and power on the toshiba family of MFDs. This
ideally would be replaced by the clock API and a bunch of power control
callbacks that would abstract it out completely from the tmio-mmc driver
and into either platform or MFD core code depending on what the user of
the driver is.
IOW, using the clock API will fix it for everyone.
> bI'd kind of expect an impact on the
> SoCs from addressing it due to the way the clock API functions are
> currently provided.
Quite.
-Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists