[an error occurred while processing this directive]
| 
| [an error occurred while processing this directive] |  | 
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A7055D4.7000905@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:59:48 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] Nested SVM cleanups
On 07/29/2009 04:48 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Performance isn't too bad even without this. At least if the host
> supports nested paging :) But shadow nested paging should give nested
> svm a real boost, thats very true.
>    
Well, any workload that benefits from npt would benefit from nnpt a lot 
more.
-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
