[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0907290952001.3087-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:56:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, <stable@...nel.org>,
<stable-review@...nel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 14/71] USB: EHCI: use the new clear_tt_buffer interface
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.30-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>
> commit 914b701280a76f96890ad63eb0fa99bf204b961c upstream.
>
> This patch (as1256) changes ehci-hcd and all the other drivers in the
> EHCI family to make use of the new clear_tt_buffer callbacks. When a
> Clear-TT-Buffer request is in progress for a QH, the QH is not allowed
> to be linked into the async schedule until the request is finished.
> At that time, if there are any URBs queued for the QH, it is linked
> into the async schedule.
Greg, can we hold off on applying this patch to the stable tree?
It turns out that this change causes a WARN_ON to trigger in some
circumstances, and the proposed patch to fix _that_ hasn't yet been
submitted to the mainline because a few people have reported that it
leaks DMA pool memory. So far there hasn't been much progress in
tracking this down.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists