[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090729150716.GG1534@ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:07:16 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to handle >16TB devices on 32 bit hosts ??
Hi!
> > > Also, for filesystems like btrfs or ZFS the checking can be done
> > > online and incrementally without storing a full representation of
> > > the state in memory.
> >
> > You could, but I suspect it would be cheaper to just use a
> > 64bit system than to rewrite fsck. 64bit is available
> > for a lot of embedded setups these days too.
>
> We don't have to rewrite fsck; most of the framework for supporting an
> run-length-conding for compressed bitmaps is already in patches that
> add > 32-bit block numbers to e2fsprogs; we've just been more focused
> on getting 64-bit block numbers support merged than implementing
> compressed bitmaps, but it's only one file that would need to be
> added, and we might be able to steal the compressed bitmap support
> from xfsprogs --- which does this already.
Well... 'If allocation pattern is bad your fsck runs out of address
space and breaks on your 15T fs' would scare me.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists