[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090729162844.GA22561@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:28:44 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: consistent use of __u8 in scsi/scsi.h
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:56:03AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 14:11 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > scsi/scsi.h is exported to userspace, so it should
> > use __u8 instead of u8 as other userspace-visible headers do.
>
> Actually, can we just put a hold on this until we decide what we're
> doing with exporting include/scsi.
>
> Arguments so far are
>
> 1. Don't export and let glibc supply the headers (as it does now)
> 2. Move headers to be exported to include/linux
> 3. Take over include/scsi export from glibc: this will necessitate
> comparing our current headers and those of glibc and moving
> stuff around.
2 + 3...
Let include/scsi be kernel internal stuff.
And have the exported headers in include/linux.
This is how net/ handle their headers.
I did a quick diff of the glibc provided scsi.h and kernel scsi.h.
>From a quick look it seems that we have more in the kernel version
than the glibc version - and no obvious conflicts.
But agree with Boaz that we should do this in one go.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists