[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248885667.4545.2673.camel@calx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:41:07 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Moussa Ba <moussa.a.ba@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, adobriyan@...il.com, yinghan@...gle.com,
npiggin@...e.de, jaredeh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pagemap clear_refs: modify to specify anon or
mapped vma clearing
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:58 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Total aside, is there potential to really mess with LRU aging by abusing
> clear_refs a lot, partcularly as clear_refs is writable by the process
> owner? Does it matter?
Absolutely. However, it's generally the process owner who will suffer.
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists