linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [x86, msr]: execute on the correct CPU subset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090729180244.GA28534@liondog.tnic>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:02:44 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [x86, msr]: execute on the correct CPU subset

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:30:45AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/29/2009 09:49 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:46:26PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Any reason not to use get_cpu() ... put_cpu() instead?
> > 
> > In case you haven't applied the one from yesterday yet, here's a better
> > one which uses struct cpumask * instead of cpumask_t.
> > 
> 
> Mangled patch (quoted-printable).

Sorry about that, will resend tomorrow.
 
> Furthermore, are there any users for this interface at this time?

Yep, drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/