[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090729212216.GB16970@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:22:16 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpusets: fix deadlock with cpu_down()->cpuset_lock()
I strongly believe the bug does exist, but this patch needs the review
from maintainers.
Suppose that task T bound to CPU takes callback_mutex. If cpu_down(CPU)
happens before T drops callback_mutex we have a deadlock.
stop_machine() preempts T, then migration_call(CPU_DEAD) tries to take
cpuset_lock() and hangs forever because CPU is already dead and thus
T can't be scheduled.
This patch unexports cpuset_lock/cpuset_unlock and converts kernel/cpuset.c
to use these helpers instead of lock/unlock of callback_mutex. The only
reason for migration_call()->cpuset_lock() was cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()
called by move_task_off_dead_cpu(), so this patch adds get_online_cpus() to
cpuset_lock().
IOW, with this patch migration_call(CPU_DEAD) runs without callback_mutex,
but kernel/cpuset.c always takes get_online_cpus() before callback_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 6 ---
kernel/sched.c | 2 -
kernel/cpuset.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
--- CPUHP/include/linux/cpuset.h~CPU_SET_LOCK 2009-06-17 14:11:26.000000000 +0200
+++ CPUHP/include/linux/cpuset.h 2009-07-29 22:17:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ struct seq_file;
extern void cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct seq_file *m,
struct task_struct *task);
-extern void cpuset_lock(void);
-extern void cpuset_unlock(void);
-
extern int cpuset_mem_spread_node(void);
static inline int cpuset_do_page_mem_spread(void)
@@ -157,9 +154,6 @@ static inline void cpuset_task_status_al
{
}
-static inline void cpuset_lock(void) {}
-static inline void cpuset_unlock(void) {}
-
static inline int cpuset_mem_spread_node(void)
{
return 0;
--- CPUHP/kernel/sched.c~CPU_SET_LOCK 2009-07-23 17:06:39.000000000 +0200
+++ CPUHP/kernel/sched.c 2009-07-29 22:18:33.000000000 +0200
@@ -7550,7 +7550,6 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
case CPU_DEAD:
case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
- cpuset_lock(); /* around calls to cpuset_cpus_allowed_lock() */
migrate_live_tasks(cpu);
rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
kthread_stop(rq->migration_thread);
@@ -7565,7 +7564,6 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
rq->idle->sched_class = &idle_sched_class;
migrate_dead_tasks(cpu);
spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
- cpuset_unlock();
migrate_nr_uninterruptible(rq);
BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 0);
calc_global_load_remove(rq);
--- CPUHP/kernel/cpuset.c~CPU_SET_LOCK 2009-06-17 14:11:26.000000000 +0200
+++ CPUHP/kernel/cpuset.c 2009-07-29 22:49:30.000000000 +0200
@@ -215,6 +215,21 @@ static struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
static DEFINE_MUTEX(callback_mutex);
+static void cpuset_lock(void)
+{
+ /* Protect against cpu_down(), move_task_off_dead_cpu() needs
+ * cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()
+ */
+ get_online_cpus();
+ mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+}
+
+static void cpuset_unlock(void)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ put_online_cpus();
+}
+
/*
* cpuset_buffer_lock protects both the cpuset_name and cpuset_nodelist
* buffers. They are statically allocated to prevent using excess stack
@@ -890,9 +905,9 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset
is_load_balanced = is_sched_load_balance(trialcs);
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
/*
* Scan tasks in the cpuset, and update the cpumasks of any
@@ -1093,9 +1108,9 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset
if (retval < 0)
goto done;
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
cs->mems_allowed = trialcs->mems_allowed;
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
update_tasks_nodemask(cs, &oldmem, &heap);
@@ -1207,9 +1222,9 @@ static int update_flag(cpuset_flagbits_t
spread_flag_changed = ((is_spread_slab(cs) != is_spread_slab(trialcs))
|| (is_spread_page(cs) != is_spread_page(trialcs)));
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
cs->flags = trialcs->flags;
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
if (!cpumask_empty(trialcs->cpus_allowed) && balance_flag_changed)
async_rebuild_sched_domains();
@@ -1516,9 +1531,9 @@ static int cpuset_sprintf_cpulist(char *
{
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
ret = cpulist_scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, cs->cpus_allowed);
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -1527,9 +1542,9 @@ static int cpuset_sprintf_memlist(char *
{
nodemask_t mask;
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
mask = cs->mems_allowed;
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
return nodelist_scnprintf(page, PAGE_SIZE, mask);
}
@@ -1980,12 +1995,12 @@ static void scan_for_empty_cpusets(struc
oldmems = cp->mems_allowed;
/* Remove offline cpus and mems from this cpuset. */
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
cpumask_and(cp->cpus_allowed, cp->cpus_allowed,
cpu_online_mask);
nodes_and(cp->mems_allowed, cp->mems_allowed,
node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
/* Move tasks from the empty cpuset to a parent */
if (cpumask_empty(cp->cpus_allowed) ||
@@ -2029,9 +2044,9 @@ static int cpuset_track_online_cpus(stru
}
cgroup_lock();
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
cpumask_copy(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, cpu_online_mask);
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
scan_for_empty_cpusets(&top_cpuset);
ndoms = generate_sched_domains(&doms, &attr);
cgroup_unlock();
@@ -2055,9 +2070,9 @@ static int cpuset_track_online_nodes(str
switch (action) {
case MEM_ONLINE:
case MEM_OFFLINE:
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
top_cpuset.mems_allowed = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
if (action == MEM_OFFLINE)
scan_for_empty_cpusets(&top_cpuset);
break;
@@ -2100,9 +2115,9 @@ void __init cpuset_init_smp(void)
void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask)
{
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(tsk, pmask);
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
}
/**
@@ -2135,11 +2150,11 @@ nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct ta
{
nodemask_t mask;
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
task_lock(tsk);
guarantee_online_mems(task_cs(tsk), &mask);
task_unlock(tsk);
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
return mask;
}
@@ -2252,14 +2267,14 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int n
return 1;
/* Not hardwall and node outside mems_allowed: scan up cpusets */
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_lock();
task_lock(current);
cs = nearest_hardwall_ancestor(task_cs(current));
task_unlock(current);
allowed = node_isset(node, cs->mems_allowed);
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpuset_unlock();
return allowed;
}
@@ -2302,33 +2317,6 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall(int n
}
/**
- * cpuset_lock - lock out any changes to cpuset structures
- *
- * The out of memory (oom) code needs to mutex_lock cpusets
- * from being changed while it scans the tasklist looking for a
- * task in an overlapping cpuset. Expose callback_mutex via this
- * cpuset_lock() routine, so the oom code can lock it, before
- * locking the task list. The tasklist_lock is a spinlock, so
- * must be taken inside callback_mutex.
- */
-
-void cpuset_lock(void)
-{
- mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
-}
-
-/**
- * cpuset_unlock - release lock on cpuset changes
- *
- * Undo the lock taken in a previous cpuset_lock() call.
- */
-
-void cpuset_unlock(void)
-{
- mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
-}
-
-/**
* cpuset_mem_spread_node() - On which node to begin search for a page
*
* If a task is marked PF_SPREAD_PAGE or PF_SPREAD_SLAB (as for
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists