[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090729063511.GA21652@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:35:11 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ian Molton <ian@...menth.co.uk>, pierre@...man.eu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
nico@....org, nicolas.ferre@....atmel.com, hskinnemoen@...el.com,
tony@...mide.com, david-b@...bell.net, manuel.lauss@...il.com,
mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl, ppisa@...ron.com,
jarkko.lavinen@...ia.com, ben@...ff.org, saschasommer@...enet.de,
avorontsov@...mvista.com, oakad@...oo.com, HaraldWelte@...tech.com,
JosephChan@....com.tw, adrian.hunter@...ia.com
Subject: Re: New MMC maintainer needed
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:41:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:40 +0100
> Ian Molton <ian@...menth.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> > > MMC discussions tend to often be very system specific, which makes
> > > lists such as the arm kernel list more appropriate. Also, I've always
> > > tried to steer people to LKML as it allows others to keep a casual eye
> > > on things.
> >
> > I think an MMC list wouldnt be a bad idea now that we have a sort of
> > 'distributed maintainership' thing going on... itd help get people up to
> > speed...
>
> I expect that Dave Miller can set up linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org in a
> jiffy. A MAINTAINERS patch should be made if this is done.
>
> What I am unsure about is whether and how web-based archives of the vger
> lists come into being - is it automatic, or should people be asked?
It was a manual process when I had linux-kbuild created.
I contacted marc and one other place I do not recall right now.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists