[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28082.1248956470@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:21:10 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>, dwalker@...o99.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 02/12] remove clocksource inline functions
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:27:54 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky said:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:36:46 +0100 Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com> wrote:
> > An argument for the helper is that it eases grepability. Sure you can
> > search for "->read" but that's going to turn up all kinds of
> > non-clocksource code as well. grep clocksource_read will get you
> > exactly what you want.
>
> That would make sense if the clocksource_read calls are littered all
> over the kernel source. But they are not, the only user is
> timekeeping.c
You know that a priori because you're familiar with that code. But there's
another use case: An idiot monkey like myself manages to break the kernel
*again* in some part of the kernel they're totally unfamiliar with, and
they need to discover for themselves that timekeeping.c is the only user.
(Of course, in another 5-6 years I'll probably have broken something in
every part of the kernel and whinged at Andrew about it, and that argument
won't apply anymore.. ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists