linux-kernel - Re: I.1 - System calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c86c4470907300953g255c6088t7caaa1188be164e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:53:30 +0200
From:	stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
	Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>,
	Corey J Ashford <cjashfor@...ibm.com>,
	Philip Mucci <mucci@...s.utk.edu>,
	Dan Terpstra <terpstra@...s.utk.edu>,
	perfmon2-devel <perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: I.1 - System calls - ioctl

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann<arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 30 July 2009, stephane eranian wrote:
>> long sys_perf_counter_open(
>>        struct perf_counter_attr *attr,
>>        enum perf_target_type  target_type,
>>        int target_id,
>>        int group_fd,
>>        unsigned long flags);
>>
>> Which is what you had, except without the struct.
>>
>> Then, it boils down to whether expressing a target id in 32 bits is enough.
>> Obviously, 64-bit would be the safest but then I understand this causes issues
>> on 32-bit systems.
>
> Just make it an unsigned long then, that still covers all cases
> where you only need the 64-bit type on 64-bit systems.
>
But that won't always work in the case of a 32-bit monitoring tool
running on top of
a 64-bit OS. Imagine the target id is indeed 64-bit, e.g., inode
number (as suggested
by Peter). It's not because you are a 32-bit tool than you cannot name
a monitoring
resource in a 64-bit OS.



>        Arnd <><
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/