[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090730.142906.266849967.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: heder@...gle.com, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jengelh@...ozas.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IPVS: use pr_err and friends instead of
IP_VS_ERR and friends
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:56:55 -0700
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 22:35 +0200, Hannes Eder wrote:
>> Since pr_err and friends is used instead of printk there is not point
>> in keeping IP_VS_ERR and friends.
>> + pr_err("Schedule: port zero only supported "
>> + "in persistent services, "
>> + "check your ipvs configuration\n");
>
> You might consider ignoring the checkpatch 80 char limit here
> and consolidate the message into a single string.
I don't think this is such a big deal.
>> - IP_VS_ERR("ip_vs_svc_unhash(): request for unhash flagged, "
>> - "called from %p\n", __builtin_return_address(0));
>> + pr_err("ip_vs_svc_unhash(): request for unhash flagged, "
>> + "called from %p\n", __builtin_return_address(0));
>
> Maybe use something like:
> "%s(): <foo> called from %pf",
> __func__, __builtin_return_address(0)
>
However I do agree that this change should be made.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists