linux-kernel - Re: memory-controller patch fails to boot in qemu [mmotm]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 2 Aug 2009 03:56:02 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: memory-controller patch fails to boot in qemu [mmotm]

* Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk> [2009-08-01 23:09:09]:

> On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > * Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> [2009-08-01 16:07:38]:
> > > 
> > > in mmotm-2009-07-30-05-01, the patch named
> > > memory-controller-soft-limit-organize-cgroups-v9.patch
> > > causes qemu fail to boot with tons of:
> > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: async/2/480/0x10000002
> > > Modules linked in:
> > > Pid: 480, comm: async/2 Tainted: G       AW  2.6.31-rc4-mm1-bh #13
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  [<ffffffff81036b6c>] __schedule_bug+0x5c/0x70
> > >  [<ffffffff8140491b>] thread_return+0x5c1/0x786
> > >  [<ffffffff8103dd30>] __cond_resched+0x20/0x50
> > >  [<ffffffff81404b9d>] _cond_resched+0x2d/0x40
> > >  [<ffffffff81096694>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x224/0x450
> > >  [<ffffffff8106dfa1>] ? smp_call_function_many+0x1e1/0x210
> > >  [<ffffffff810e50d0>] ? invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x90
> > >  [<ffffffff810e514b>] ? invalidate_bh_lru+0x7b/0x90
> > >  [<ffffffff810e50d0>] ? invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x90
> > >  [<ffffffff810968d0>] truncate_inode_pages+0x10/0x20
> > >  [<ffffffff810ea875>] kill_bdev+0x35/0x40
> > >  [<ffffffff810eba18>] __blkdev_put+0xa8/0x190
> > >  [<ffffffff810ebb0b>] blkdev_put+0xb/0x10
> > >  [<ffffffff81116f62>] register_disk+0x172/0x180
> > >  [<ffffffff8115bca5>] add_disk+0x85/0x150
> > >  [<ffffffff812398cf>] sd_probe_async+0x12f/0x200
> > >  [<ffffffff810616ca>] async_thread+0x10a/0x270
> > >  [<ffffffff8103f7a0>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10
> > >  [<ffffffff810615c0>] ? async_thread+0x0/0x270
> > >  [<ffffffff8105ac66>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> > >  [<ffffffff8100ceaa>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> > >  [<ffffffff8105abd0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
> > >  [<ffffffff8100cea0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> > > 
> > > Looks like an omitted unlock. I don't see anything suspicious in the
> > > patch though.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for the report, did you bisect the mmotm series to identify the
> > root cause? What does your .config look like? I tried kvm with the
> > patches (mmotm 30th July) and qemu-kvm (30th-july) with a Fedora 11
> > guest image and the system booted just fine for me.
> > 
> > Could you share your command line as well?
> 
> I've just finished chasing something similar (without qemu),
> and was about to post this:
> 
> [PATCH mmotm] memory controller: soft limit organize cgroups v9 fix
> 
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y CONFIG_PREEMPT=y mmotm fails to boot:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found; after lots of scheduling
> while atomics, starting from when async_thread does sd_probe_async.
> 
> mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check() was doing an unbalanced get_cpu():
> don't get_cpu if we won't need it, and put_cpu if we did get_cpu.
> 
> Hmm, this a weird function, passed an argument just to tell it to do
> nothing.  Perhaps a placeholder for something more sensible to come?

The argument is passed a result of a function, It no-ops quite
frequently for the root cgroup.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
> ---
> Fix to memory-controller-soft-limit-organize-cgroups-v9.patch
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- mmotm/mm/memcontrol.c	2009-08-01 05:48:08.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/mm/memcontrol.c	2009-08-01 21:45:37.000000000 +0100
> @@ -375,19 +375,21 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(
>  					bool over_soft_limit)
>  {
>  	bool ret = false;
> -	int cpu = get_cpu();
> +	int cpu;
>  	s64 val;
>  	struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu *cpustat;
> 
>  	if (!over_soft_limit)
>  		return ret;
> 
> +	cpu = get_cpu();
>  	cpustat = &mem->stat.cpustat[cpu];
>  	val = __mem_cgroup_stat_read_local(cpustat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_EVENTS);
>  	if (unlikely(val > SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH)) {
>  		__mem_cgroup_stat_reset_safe(cpustat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_EVENTS);
>  		ret = true;
>  	}
> +	put_cpu();
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 

Thanks, my bad, I should have spotted the missing put_cpu(). I'll test
this with CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG and report back. The
patch obviously looks correct, but I'll test it as well.


-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/