[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A745C9F.7000301@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:17:51 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: fix sparse warning
Hi,
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:53 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> Whether or not the sparse warning
>>
>> warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
>>
>> is justified or not in this case, it is annoying and
>> trivial to fix.
>
> Whatever happened to this patch? Did you decide to screw sparse
> warnings?
I thought Vegard applied the patch but I can't see it in kmemcheck.git
either. Vegard?
Pekka
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
>> ---
>> include/linux/kmemcheck.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- wireless-testing.orig/include/linux/kmemcheck.h 2009-07-06 11:41:16.000000000 +0200
>> +++ wireless-testing/include/linux/kmemcheck.h 2009-07-06 11:41:30.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -137,13 +137,13 @@ static inline void kmemcheck_mark_initia
>> int name##_end[0];
>>
>> #define kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(ptr, name) \
>> - do if (ptr) { \
>> + do { if (ptr) { \
>> int _n = (long) &((ptr)->name##_end) \
>> - (long) &((ptr)->name##_begin); \
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(_n < 0); \
>> \
>> kmemcheck_mark_initialized(&((ptr)->name##_begin), _n); \
>> - } while (0)
>> + } } while (0)
>>
>> #define kmemcheck_annotate_variable(var) \
>> do { \
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists