[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A75DEFA.1070009@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:46:18 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch/parisc fixes for 2.6.31-rc6
On 08/02/2009 08:06 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 07:51:29PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>> On 08/02/2009 07:21 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 07:02:22PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>>>> Hi Linus,
>>>>
>>>> please pull the following changes for the HP parisc architecture.
>>> Uhm, I didn't authorize you to do this...
>> I'm equally authorized like you.
>>
>> MAINTAINERS file shows:
>> PARISC ARCHITECTURE
>> M: Kyle McMartin<kyle@...artin.ca>
>> M: Helge Deller<deller@....de>
>
> That's not how this works.
Cool. Great argument!
>>> WTF?
>> During the development cycle of 2.6.26 up to 2.6.30, many
>> patches were not pushed upstream by someone.
>> Now I'm having a whole lot of work to push the missing patches
>> back into the stable-kernel and debian kernel series.
>> That's the reason I don't want that those patches miss 2.6.31 too...
>>
>
> Then send *me* a pull request. Don't give me a bloody end-around, it's
> simply unacceptable behaviour.
I'm missing a very important thing here:
Can you guarantee, that you will push things upstream in time?
If yes, I'm fine with sending you a push request.
If not, I don't see any other way.
Helge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists