[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090802081602.GB5011@linux-sh.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:16:02 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] ftrace: Correctly calculate the first function in the .text section
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:45:46PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:52:47AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!defined($ref_func) || !defined($weak{$text})) {
> > > > > to
> > > > > if (!defined($ref_func) && !defined($weak{$text})) {
> > > > >
> > > > > This now matches the comment above the conditional.
> > > >
> > > > This is the true bug. But the previous is not.
> > >
> > > Could you resend the patch with this fix only. Then I can send it out as
> > > an ugent fix.
> > >
> > Is anything happening with these patches? Without them, a lot of SH
> > configurations are completely broken.
>
> Thomas,
>
> Could you push these off to Linus? My git pull request had:
>
> Message-ID: <20090723210047.294710482@...dmis.org>
>
This is still outstanding. Should I just merge it in to my tree and send
it to Linus instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists