[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090802213528.GA18795@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:35:28 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Possible memory leak via alloc_pid()
On 07/31, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 23:29 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Since you can reproduce the problem easily, perhaps you can use the
> > hack above to track get/put ?
> >
> > $ echo pid_of_Xorg > /proc/sys/kernel/xxx
>
> Below is the minicom capture. By the time Xorg dies, the count is 2.
Thanks a lot Catalin.
> When logging out, there are two counter incrementing events via
> sys_wait4 and sys_ioctl, thoush I'm not sure whether they are
> unbalanced.
wait4() is right, ioctl() looks fine too.
> pgrep Xorg
> 1519
> 10:~# pgrep Xorg > /proc/sys/kernel/xxx
> XXXXX(1519) ==22
Unfortunately there is nothing which looks like a leak. I gueess it is
too late to start the tracking.
I'm afraid this won't really help too, but since nobody has a better
idea for now, perhaps you can do another test?
Pleas rename Xorg to Xorg.origin, and make a simple Xorg script which
does something like
#!/bin/sh
echo $$ >> /proc/sys/kernel/xxx
exec /path/to/Xorg.origin $*
perhaps even this is too late, gdm can do a lot before execing.
Please avoid pgrep/ps/etc, proc adds a lot of noise. Better yet, it
would be nice to start/stop Xorg with /proc unmounted, but I don't
know is this can work without /proc.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists