lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090803101401.GA14442@aftab>
Date:	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:14:01 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Boot failure on x86_64 (OOPS set_cpu_sibling_map() )

Hi Ingo,

On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Borislav, this patch:
> 
>  From 4581c6313c16a38ffcef8bccd6ffbe9598d585b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>  From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
>  Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:21:06 +0200
>  Subject: [PATCH] x86: provide CPU topology information for multi-node processors
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |    2 ++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h       |    6 ++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h  |    2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c     |    2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c       |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c        |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> has absolutely _ZERO_ place in the EDAC tree. It was submitted to 
> the x86 tree and was under discussion - i requested changes to it so 
> this current form has my NAK.

I know that, I'm following the discussion. I needed the functionality in
EDAC and that's why I added them _temporarily_ to the mix so that the
whole series (esp. the MCE bits) can see some testing. Which obviously
caught some issues :).

But I'm very well aware that the patches are not final and they will go
through x86 when done. This is what I told Stephen when upping them for
linux-next.

Sorry if I've caused any misunderstanding.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
  System  | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
 Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
  Center  | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
  (OSRC)  | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ