[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090803072522.1d90f15c@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:25:22 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
oprofile-list <oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/26] oprofile: Performance counter multiplexing
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:22:20 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> This new oprofile multiplexing mechanism really overlaps the PMU
> abstractions that perfcounters already provide, and i disagree with
> this general direction. The code you wrote is clean though so i've
is there any way thast the oprofole interfaces can be written on top
of the low level perf infrastructure?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists